I’m soooooo excited! Monday I finally received my Christmas/B-day gift…a new Nikon D3100 DSLR complete with the stock 18-55mm Nikkor AF-S VR Lens as well as the AF-S DX VR Zoom-Nikkor 55-200mm f/4-5.6G IF-ED Lens and some other assorted goodies. Can you say kid in a candy store!
Now I can say I am by no means a photographer. Until recently I had little interest in photography and never owned anything better than a point and shoot camera; and I wasn’t even particularly good with that. This started changing when my daughter was born 8 months ago. I started to enjoy taking pictures of her especially, but also of other things. Then I started Eating Bangkok and yes I realize it’s my skill that will make the most difference in my photography, but I felt I should at least have decent tools to help me be all I could be as a photographer. Plus I’m a guy and you know how we love our expensive electronic toys!
I spent quite some time looking at the differences between digital SLR’s. Canon’s Rebel XT series is a very nice camera, but at the end of the day I felt Nikon was a better camera overall, not necessarily because the body is better, but I felt the Nikkor lenses are better (although waaay expensive in many cases). So, at this point I was left choosing between the Nikon D90 and the Nikon D3100 (which is what I got). How did I choose between the two?
To be honest by most accounts these are quite similar camera’s. The major differences are sensors, lens compatibility, monitors, HD movie capability, and full-time autofocus for video.
The D3100 beats the D90 by 1.9 megapixels with it’s 14.2mp sensor. Not huge, but it’s something. The D3100 also has better high ISO performance, important if you are taking pictures in low light which I will be.
In terms of lens compatibility the D90 is the winner hands down, with one caveat. I say its the winner because the D90 will auto focus with any Nikkor lens, while the D3100 will only auto focus with the newer (and more expensive) AF-S lenses. If I already had a bunch of older lenses this might be a concern for me, but since I’m just starting out, not so much. I also think that getting an older lens that I am forced to manual focus (I’m thinking the prime 50mm f1.8 lens) will be good for my development as a photographer.
The monitor is a big difference in these two camera’s also. The D90 has the professional grade 920,000 resolution monitor which is sweet, while the D3100 comes with a much lower resolution monitor. I plan on using the viewfinder anyway, so this for me is another non-issue. The high resolution monitor would surely be nice, but not necessary.
Next up we come to HD movie capability. The D3100 has brilliant 1080p full HD movie capabilities while the D90 falls short with just 720p capabilities. To be sure the D90 is an older model and was the first Nikon to feature HD movie capability at all, but in this day the D3100 wins. And to sweeten the pot the D3100 has full time auto focus to go along with the 1080p HD movies!
Considering that I will be using the camera both for food photography here as well as doing short movies (yep I’m doing movies from Bangkok) the HD movie functionality was a game changer for me. Plus the D3100 is a couple hundred dollars cheaper than the D90, which always helps.
So, that was my thought process in choosing a new DSLR camera to help me become a better photographer for all our sakes.
I am guessing that many of you take photos for your blogs as well and I’m curious to know what type of camera you are currently using. Also, if the cost wasn’t an issue what camera do you think you would LIKE to use? I’ll be looking forward to the responses and I can tell you that tomorrow you’ll get a glimpse at some of the first pictures I’ve taken with my new baby.